July 2010

To 404(b), or Not to 404(b)?

From CFO.com.

Small companies will soon learn whether they will have to comply with Sarbox's requirement to get an auditor's sign-off on internal controls.

Dan Crow is one of the few small-company CFOs with an auditor's stamp on his internal controls. Getting it wasn't as time-consuming or as costly as it would have been several years ago, when large public companies first began complying with one of the most onerous requirements of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, known as Section 404.

Still, Crow, who oversees finance for retailer Hastings Entertainment, doesn't rule out dropping the extra review next year if Congress decides to permanently exempt small public companies from needing an auditor's sign-off on their internal controls — as it seems poised to do. The Senate is expected to vote this week on the final version of the financial regulatory-reform bill, which would exempt companies with market caps less than $75 million from complying with Section 404(b), the rule in question. (The House has already passed the bill.)

Read full article.

Leave a comment


Contact

Blackman Kallick
10 South Riverside Plaza
9th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606-3770

p 312-207-1040
f 312-207-1066
info@BlackmanKallick.com

Get Directions

This publication is part of Blackman Kallick’s marketing of professional services, and is not written tax advice directed at the specific facts and circumstances of any person and/or entity. Contents of this publication are of a general nature, and you should not act on this information without obtaining professional advice from your business advisor that is appropriately tailored to your individual needs and circumstances. This written advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.